WRITTEN
QUESTION by David Hammerstein Mintz (Verts/ALE) , Caroline Lucas
(Verts/ALE) , Angelika Beer (Verts/ALE) , Raül Romeva i Rueda
(Verts/ALE) and Monica Frassoni (Verts/ALE) to the Council
Subject:
Incident involving the nuclear submarine HMS Tireless in
Sicilian-Maltese waters; storage of nuclear weapons or materials on
Cyprus
Four years ago, in May 2000, the UK nuclear submarine HMS Tireless
suffered a serious failure with the cooling system of its nuclear
reactor. As a result of a serious defect in the welding between two
coolant containers, radioactive liquid leaked away into the
Mediterranean and, more particularly, into the Sicilian-Maltese channel
where the submarine was positioned at that time. Nothing of this was
revealed until the end of 2000, when the Tireless arrived in Gibraltar
harbour for repair in the Royal Navy dockyard. Despite the protests of
local and regional institutions, it remained there for many weeks. The
European Parliament debated the issue in plenary on 14 December 2000
and adopted a resolution in which it called upon the Commission to
inform Parliament of the answers given by the UK Government to the
Commission's request for information - legally required under several
Euratom directives - about the incident and its impact. Since then, the
issue has not been discussed. The UK authorities have continued to
state that it only a minor incident was involved, with no harmful
effects, and no further information has been disclosed. However,
independent investigations at the end of 2004 suggest that the incident
might have been far more serious than admitted by the authorities and
that large quantities of radioactive liquid were released into the sea
at the time of the incident.
1. Was the Council informed by the UK Government as to the
precise location where the incident took place, how much radioactivity
was leaked, and at what distance the emissions occurred?
2. What measures did the Council take to prevent the potentially catastrophic impact of this incident?
3. As these waters continue to be used for the passage of
nuclear submarines, how sure can the Council be that similar incidents
will not recur?
4. Would the Council agree that, in the light of the European
Security Strategy, it would be wise for nuclear powers, both EU Member
States and the USA, to stop using the Mediterranean and other narrow
waters as a route for this type of vessels?
5. Is the Council aware that the UK has been storing nuclear weapons or materials in Cyprus (Akrotiri)
6. Which other bases in the region have been used for the storage of similar materials?